Tag Archives: Employment

Union – Management Relations: It is Not Easy

images

 

Posted by Rick Dacri, June 13, 2013

In a recent post (Manager: Its Legal Definition), I recounted a response to an HR HelpLine client on how he could promote a union employee to a nonunion manager. My response elicited a comment from another client (listed below, with the client name redacted), which I wanted to share with you:

Client Comment: Many issues to consider here.  First of all, if the employer is promoting a person from the Union to exempt status, how can that person still have many of the same duties as that of the Union person?  In our organization, the duties of the “supervisor” need to be different than those of the Union position or we run the risk of grievances for a supervisor doing “Union-type” work.  Also, in munis (the client is a municipal public power), only the General Manager can “hire, transfer, lay off, promote, or discharge” employees.  We’ve promoted employees from the Union to management on occasion, but it usually depends on the person and the Union group.  In our organization, where there is a significant divide in philosophy between the Union and management, it is often difficult to get a Union employee to crossover into management and embrace a completely different ideology, especially if he/she will be supervising his/her former Union group.  The new supervisor often struggles with the new thinking, and with holding his/her former “buddies” accountable.

Dacri Response: Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Employee Relations, Leadership, Strategy

ObamaCare Good For Business

imagesPosted By Rick Dacri, June 12, 2013

Many of the pundits are warning that companies will be laying off workers or reducing work hours to skirt the regulations that require them to provide health insurance under the Affordable Care Act. One company has said “nonsense” and is actually allowing part-time employees to increase their hours so that they can become eligible for the insurance, thus increasing the number of employees who will be receiving health insurance at their company. The Cumberland Gulf Group (Cumberland Farms Convenience Stores) believes that by taking care of their employees, they will see improvements in employee engagement, retention and customer service, all resulting in increased sales and profits. Rather than focusing on short-term savings by eliminating health insurance, they’re betting on their employees and the long-term health of their company by adding employees to the insurance rolls.

The Cumberland Gulf Group has made employee satisfaction a corporate priority and knows that expanding benefit coverage to more of their employees is one way to achieve this. They realize that customer satisfaction requires happy, engaged employees.

Cumberland is taking the big picture approach. It’s a smart move; it’s strategic; and it makes good business sense. Employees are not going to stick around a company that neither invests in them nor provides them affordable health insurance.

What do you think of Cumberland’s decision?  Comment below.

 Other posts you might want to read:

If you want to know more about Dacri & Associates and how we can help you, click here: Dacri & Associates

 

 

Leave a Comment

Filed under Compliance, Leadership

Workers’ Comp, FMLA & the Critical Avoidance of “Stacking”

Posted by Rick Dacri on June 11, 2013

Eligible employees who get injured at work and lose time (lost time injury) should be placed on FMLA, thus avoiding “stacking.”

Let me explain. To begin, when an employee gets injured at work, they become eligible for workers’ compensation. Secondly, if the employee loses work time, as a rule of thumb three days or more, this would be considered a “serious health condition” and the employee should be placed on a Family and Medical Leave (remember, to be eligible for FMLA, the company must employ 50 or more employees and the employee must have one or more years of service and worked 1250 hours in the previous 12 months).

Now, what is stacking? Stacking refers to the piling on one type of leave on top of another. In this case, if the employee goes out on workers’ comp with a lost time injury, by designating that time as a FMLA leave, the employee, at some future time, could not refuse a return to work with a light duty job offer by declaring the FMLA leave, at that point.

When the employer declares the leave at the onset, you take better control of the workers’ comp case, begin to exhaust the 12 weeks of FMLA leave eligibility, and avoid stacking, which if not done could result in a longer period of lost time that could include a refusal of light duty by the employee.

Remember, the employer has the right to declare the FMLA leave. Exercise it.

Questions? Give me a call. Comments? I welcome them. Just put them in the section below.

If you want to know more about how I can help you, click Dacri & Associates.

Other articles you might want to read:

  1. Control Your Workers’ Compensation Costs
  2. Light Duty Work: Must I Provide for Non-Work Related Injuries
  3. FMLA: DOL Issues New Rules Effective March 8

Leave a Comment

Filed under Compliance

Manager: Its Legal Definition

imagesPosted by Rick Dacri, June 6, 2013

 This question came to me from one of my HR HelpLine clients:

Question: If I have a union employee, can I promote that employee to a management position, outside of the union? The management position would take on all the responsibilities of the union position plus additional responsibilities.

Answer: Yes, if the employee’s new responsibilities will have significant supervisory duties, such as hiring and firing. However, you may have a problem with the union and the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) if the employee only has minor supervisory duties.

Remember, an employee’s job title does not determine whether the employee is a supervisor or manager. Rather, the term “supervisor” is defined to include any individual with the authority to perform any one of 12 specified functions, if the exercise of such authority requires the use of independent judgment and is not merely routine or clerical. Under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), the term “supervisor” means “any individual having authority, in the interest of the employer, to hire, transfer, suspend, lay off, recall, promote, discharge, assign, reward, or discipline other employees, or responsibly to direct them, or to adjust their grievances, or effectively to recommend such action, if in connection with the foregoing the exercise of such authority is not of a merely routine or clerical nature, but requires the use of independent judgment.”

Incorporate these components into the individual’s role, and he will likely be considered a manager.

 If you have questions, contact my HR HelpLine and receive expert advice on all your workforce issues.

 You may also like to read:

I welcome your comments.

1 Comment

Filed under Compliance, Uncategorized

Where Has Company Loyalty Gone?

Loyalty_shutterstock_108972260-e1350404656562(This interview of me was written by Dulcie Dimech and published in the Malta Independent)

It has become common to hear people in management roles say that company loyalty is dead, and that the current workforce a company employs is not loyal to its company or its boss. All this might be true, pointed out Rick Dacri, a human resource consultant at Dacri & Associates. Dacri further questions if anyone has ever had the experience of having one of their key employees quitting without warning for a “better” job; leaving them wondering, why this employee had taken such a decision? When turnover is on the rise in an organisation, the employers are left thinking: what is wrong with my employees?

Various studies have confirmed that loyalty among employees is dead. Nowadays employees have, on average, nine different jobs in their career. This is a real change from the older generation of workers, who joined one company and stayed there till they retired. Hence the reason why so many individuals say that those were the “good old days”. But what is happening now? And who is the culprit that killed company loyalty?

Before we condemn this generation of workers, we have to consider an option as well. Could it be possible that employers killed company loyalty? Yes that is right, elaborates Dacri, employers managed to kill employee loyalty. How could this possibly happen? Or better, why on earth would they be doing something that could be described as suicidal for their own company.

Dacri puts some questions for our consideration: Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Management, Uncategorized

Compliance: 6 Problem Areas For Employers

Posted by Rick Dacri on May 30, 2013

lawsuitThe last thing an employer needs is a lawsuit. Yet, when it comes to employment law, it is easy to find yourself in a difficult situation, which has trouble written all over it. Here are 6 areas where mistakes are often made by unprepared managers resulting in a messy and costly suit:

  1. Hiring Process: it all begins here. Asking inappropriate interview questions, making a badly chosen, but seemingly “harmless” comment that discriminates, giving an insensitive reason for rejecting a candidate, or simply making bad hire will land you in big trouble. Train all interviewers in proper interviewing techniques and hiring procedures.
  2. Negligent hiring and retention: when you know things about a candidate or employee, such as their having violent behavior or a dangerous driving record and you still hire or retain them and then they commit a similar infraction (ex. strike an employee or get into an accident driving a company car), you may be facing a lawsuit. Check references before making a hire decision. Address performance problems immediately.
  3. Discrimination in employment: Intentional or even unintentional acts of discrimination will get you into trouble. Audit your polices, procedures, pay policies, hiring, promotion and training practices to make sure all your management systems compliant. Train you managers.
  4. Discipline process: There’s nothing that will motivate an employee to call an attorney faster than a supervisor botching a disciplinary meeting. Be consistent in applying your policies, train your managers in having difficult conversations, and review all situations with upper management before meeting with the employee.
  5. Evaluation process: Giving a positive evaluation to a poor performer may help you avoid an uncomfortable appraisal interview, but rest assured, it is a recipe for disaster if you ever have to terminate that employee for performance. Give honest appraisals and train your manager on how to give appraisals.
  6. Firing process: There is no easy way to fire someone. When not done respectfully, employees nearly always want to strike back and a lawsuit is a great way to get even.  Again, review all cases before approving a termination. Make sure the manager understands what needs to be done and how to do it. Include a second manager in the process to serve as a witness and to lend support.

Minimize the risks of employee lawsuits by implementing the recommendations outlined about. Managing is hard enough without adding a lawsuit. If you need assistance, give me a call for help.

You may also like to read:

EEOC Reports Nearly 100,000 job Discrimination Charges

Reference Checking: 5 Tips to Get Great References

2012 Checklist for People Management

Are there other areas to avoid beyond these 6? Let us know in the comment section.

1 Comment

Filed under Compliance, Employee Relations

Interns: Employers Obligation To Pay or Not?

images

Posted by Rick Dacri on May 29, 2013

Summer is upon us and that means college students are out of school looking for relevant work experience and companies are hiring student interns. The perennial question is whether interns must be paid or not. How you address the issue will determine whether you’re in compliance with complicated state and federal laws or whether you end up getting an unpleasant visit from the U.S. Department Of Labor

Employers often feel that if they provide students a valuable work experience that should be sufficient. Students bolster their knowledge and resume while employers get some badly needed work done—and that’s the problem. Labor and many states believe these students are employees and must be paid.

In order to avoid violating the Fair Labor Standards Act, the internship must meet Labor’s test for “trainees.” An individual who passes this test is not considered an employee and is therefore not covered by the minimum wage or overtime provisions of the FLSA.

The Department of Labor has identified six criteria to determine whether an unpaid internship meets this test:

  1. The internship is similar to training which would be given in an educational environment;
  2. The experience is primarily for the benefit of the intern;
  3. The intern does not displace regular employees, and works under close supervision of existing staff;
  4. The employer that provides the training derives no immediate advantage from the activities of the intern;
  5. The intern is not necessarily entitled to a job at the conclusion of the internship; and
  6. The employer and the intern understand that the intern is not entitled to wages for the time spent in the internship. The test is more likely to be satisfied where the internship has a classroom component and participants learn skills applicable to multiple employment settings.

Unless your internships meet this test, they should be paid.

Look at your plans for hiring interns. If the internship is primarily educational, there is likely no need to pay. If the interns are merely extra workers, they must be paid.

If you’re not sure how to handle the situation, give me a call.

You may also like:

Internships: Labor’s 6 Criteria to Meet Before Not Paying

Leave a Comment

Filed under Compliance, Management

Federal Labor Laws By Number of Employees

lawsEmployers must comply with the various federal labor laws. Which law generally depends on the organization’s employee population. I have listed below the most common federal labor laws. Employers are also required to comply with their respective state labor laws (not listed here).

1-14 Employees

  • Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (for employment agencies and labor organizations). See 15-19 for other employers.
  • Consumer Credit Protection Act of 1968
• Employee Polygraph Protection Act of 1988
  • Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) of 1974 (if company offers benefits)
  • Equal Pay Act of 1963
  • Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003 (FACT)
  • Fair Credit Reporting Act of 1969
  • Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938
  • Federal Insurance Contributions Act of 1935 (FICA) (Social Security)
  • Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996 (if company offers benefits)
  • Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment Act of 2010 (HIRE)
  • Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986
  • Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2007
  • National Labor Relations Act of 1947
  • Newborns’ and Mothers’ Health Protection Act of 1996
  • Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970
  • Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
• Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures of 1978
  • Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994

11-14, add

  • OSHA Recordkeeping (maintain record of job related injuries and illnesses)

15-19, add

  • Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
  • Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
  • Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) of 2008

20-49, add

  • Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967
  • Consolidated Omnibus Benefits Reconciliation Act (COBRA) of 1986

50 or more, add

  • Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
  • EEO-1 Report filed annually w/EEOC if organization is a federal contractor
  • Mental Health Parity Act of 1996 (for employers who offer mental health benefits)
  • Mental Health and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (for employers who offer mental health benefits)
  • Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (for employers who offer health care benefits)

100 or more, add

  • Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act of 1988
  • EEO-1 Report filed annually w/EEOC if organization is not a federal contractor

Federal Contractors, add

  • Executive Order 11246 of 1965
  • Vocational Rehabilitation Act of 1973
  • Drug Free Workplace Act of 1988
  • Vietnam-Era Veterans Readjustment Act of 1974
  • Davis Bacon Act of 1931
  • Copeland Act of 1934
  • Walsh-Healy Act of 1936
  •  Service Contract Act (1965)
  • Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (CWHSSA)

If you have questions about the laws or how you must comply, feel free to contact me at Dacri & Associates for assistance.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Compliance

Practical Solutions To Your Workforce Questions

Not knowing how to deal with some problems within your workforce can make your job miserable. That’s what managers tell me all the time–and that’s why I developed the HR HelpLine.

The HR HelpLine provides expert, confidential advice on all employee issues so you can effectively run your organization. Business owners, senior managers & HR professionals use this service to solve their human resource problems and get practical advice on difficult workforce situations.

Call Rick Dacri at 207-967-0837 for a FREE initial consultation. I guarantee you’ll get the answers you need.

TOP TEN BENEFITS TO THE HR HELPLINE

10. You’ll get answers to all your workforce questions FAST Whether as basic as an attendance issue or as complicated as handling a sexual harassment claim-I’ll have expert advice for you.

9. You’ll always know how to address the difficult employee issues I’ll provide you a back to basics approach to dealing with employees–practical and uncomplicated

8. Employment law will finally be clear to you No more legalese-just straight answers–a simple, uncomplicated approach

7. You’ll always be talking to an expert whom you can trust You’ll only talk to me, Rick Dacri, who’ll find solutions for you that makes sense Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Compliance, Employee Relations

I-9 Forms: New Forms Required

You must be using the new I-9 Form. As I noted in my March blog, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) revised the Employment Eligibility Verification Form I-9. Click to get Form. All employers are required to complete a Form I-9 for each employee hired in the United States.

Improvements to Form I-9 include new fields, reformatting to reduce errors, and clearer instructions to both employees and employers. The Department of Homeland Security has published a Notice in the Federal Register informing employers of the new Form I-9.

Effective May 7, 2013, employers must only use Form I-9 (Rev. 03/08/13)N.

 If you have any questions, contact the HR HelpLine.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Compliance