Tag Archives: Telecommuting

How To Pay When Your Facilities Close For Weather-Related Reasons?

stormPost by Alex Passantino, Seyfarth Shaw LLP on January 26th, 2015

As Juno prepares to pummel the Northeast with snow, employers should prepare for any weather-related closures of their offices, factories, or other facilities.  The effect of a weather-related closure on compensation requirements varies for different types of employees and also varies by state.


Most employees who are exempt from federal overtime requirements and paid on a salary basis are not subject to reductions to their weekly salaries because of a closure.  Even if an exempt employee misses a full day of work, the employer may not reduce the employee’s weekly salary (unless the employee misses an entire work week).  An employer that improperly reduces an employee’s salary might lose or jeopardize the ability to treat the employee as exempt from overtime pay requirements — potentially a very costly mistake.

Even though employers will almost certainly have to pay exempt employees their full salaries regardless of storm-related closures, employers do have the right to charge exempt employees for vacation or PTO for any work that they miss.  Employees who do not have enough accrued vacation or PTO to cover the closure, however, must still be paid their full weekly salaries.

The legal rules for paying exempt employees apply in all states.  Of course, in deciding whether to charge employees with vacation or PTO, employers may also want to consider non-legal factors such as employee morale and the organization’s finances.


For non-exempt employees, federal law requires only that employers pay employees for the hours they actually work.


In assessing pay requirements for all employees, employers should keep in mind that, even if an office or other facility is closed, some employees might work remotely.  Work performed remotely generally must be paid to the same extent as work performed on an employer’s premises — even if the employer did not request that the work be performed.  Non-exempt employees working remotely must generally be paid at their usual hourly rate (and subject to the usual requirements for overtime pay).


Certain Northeastern states have additional requirements that apply to hourly employees who report to work when a facility is closed or not operating at full capacity.  For example:

  • Connecticut has a reporting pay requirement that applies to employees in the “Mercantile trade.”  Employees in that industry must be paid four hours at their regular rate of pay, if they actually report for work.  The “Mercantile trade” is defined as the wholesale or retail selling of commodities and any operation supplemental or incidental thereto.  A two-hour guarantee is in place for the restaurant and hotel industries, if the employee was not “given adequate notice the day before” that she should not report for work.
  • Massachusetts mandates reporting pay for non-exempt employees of at least three hours at the statutory minimum wage ($9.00) if they are scheduled to work more than three hours on a given day and actually report for work.  Employees scheduled for less than three hours need only be paid for their scheduled hours.
  • New Hampshire requires reporting pay for non-exempt employees who actually report for work of at least two hours at their regular rate.
  • New Jersey requires reporting pay for non-exempt employees who actually report for work of at least one hour at their applicable wage rate (unless, prior to this report to work, the employer already made available to the employee the minimum number of hours of work agreed upon for the week).
  • New York requires “call-in pay” for non-exempt employees of at least four hours, or the number of hours in the regularly scheduled shift (whichever is less) at the basic minimum hourly wage ($8.75) for employees who actually report for work.  A 2009 New York Department of Labor opinion letter, however, interpreted the reporting-pay obligation as not applying if “the amount paid to an employee for the workweek exceeds the minimum and overtime rate for the number of hours worked and the minimum wage rate for any call-in pay owed.”  Employees working in the hospitality industry may be subject to different requirements.
  • Rhode Island requires an employer to pay an employee who reports for duty at the beginning of a work shift (where the employer offers no work for him to perform) not less than three (3) times the employee’s regular hourly rate of pay.
  • Washington, D.C., requires reporting pay of at least four hours at the statutory minimum wage ($9.50) for non-exempt employees who actually report for work if they are scheduled to work for at least four hours.  Employees scheduled for less than four hours need only be paid for their scheduled hours.

Some of the reporting pay requirements noted above may be waived if the employer makes a good faith effort to provide employees with reasonable advance notice that they should not to report to work.  Employers that foresee that their facilities will be closed should give employees who are scheduled to work as much notice as possible for both practical and wage/hour compliance reasons.

If you have questions, call Rick Dacri at rick@dacri.com or 207-229-5954.


Leave a comment

Filed under Compliance, Management

Policies Impact Lifestyle and Life

 images(This article, written by Rick Dacri, was originally published in the York County Coast Star)

I’ve always found in corporate life that the decisions you make, the policies you develop, rarely have consequences so severe that they shake you to your core. Until now.

The recent decisions of two organizations force us to rethink the policies we create, and what we demand of our workers. One requires us to reevaluate how we manage, the other what it means to be human.

Yahoo’s CEO either ignited a firestorm or opened a debate on the value of telecommuting. Yahoo informed all their remote workers that they would no longer be allowed to work out of their homes and by June they had to return to their desks at Yahoo’s offices. Those who refuse will be asked to resign.

What makes the decision so surprising for some is that Yahoo is led by one of the few female CEOs running a Fortune 500 company and one who just had a baby. Surely she would be more sensitive to the issues facing workingwomen today.  But before we declare that the glass ceiling is clearly now impenetrable and predict that this is the beginning of the end for family friendly employment policies, think again.

Allowing employees to work from home still makes good business sense for many organizations. Technology has made it possible for many to work anywhere without the need to take up valuable corporate real estate. While Yahoo believes their remote workers will be more productive in their company offices, allowing greater collaboration and sharing of ideas, independent studies have shown that home based workers work longer hours per week and are much more productive on average than regular workers.

 Telecommuting remains a powerful recruitment and retention tool. Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under Leadership